A poem of lament for advent, a cry to God for rescue, to turn chaos and evil to order and peace. Come Lord Jesus, come.
A poem of lament for advent, a cry to God for rescue, to turn chaos and evil to order and peace. Come Lord Jesus, come.
The words of Amos, one of the shepherds of Tekoa—the vision he saw concerning Israel two years before the earthquake. Amos 1:1
The prophecy of Amos, the shepherd prophet, who lived 800 years before Christ, opens with a unique contextual reference. Amos spoke God’s words two years before the earthquake.
The earthquake is a consistent thread through the prophecy, as it features in 2:13, 3:14-15, 6:11, 8:8, 9:1a & 5.
There is a second consistent thread through the prophecy. The wrath of God against the sinfulness the nations, including Judah and Israel 1:3,6,9,11,13 2:1,4,6). The sins of the nations include many contemporary issues: people trafficking (1:6 & 1:9), violence against women and unborn babies (1:11), unjust war (1:3), child sacrifice and burning alive the ruler of foreigners (2:1). The sins of Judah stem from rejecting God’s laws and decrees (2:4). God announces that the people of Judah will be judged with the world because they live like the world around them.
The prophesied earthquake is the means by which God exercises his wrath against sinfulness and evil, including the people of Judah. Not all earthquakes are like this. Jesus teaches us that the tower of Siloam collapsed killing 18 people and it was not because of their sin. We can say that earthquakes are a sign of God’s wrath. In the case of the earthquake which occurred around 750BC, God had revealed by his word through the prophet Amos that he would not hold back his wrath.
The opening chapter of Amos has four lessons for followers of Christ.
1. Do not fret, worry or be anxious about evil or feel helpless in the face of evil. God’s wrath is coming.
2. Do not coalesce or even toy with evil. The followers of Jesus must be holy and distinctive, or be judged with the world.
3. Remember the cross. As Jesus died the sky darked and the earth shook. The wrath of God has not and will not be turned away from human evil. The wrath of God was born by the eternal Son, as the triune God turned his wrath from the people he loves and took it within himself, as Father, Son and Holy Spirit worked together to rescue us from the wrath to come.
4. There will be wars and rumours of wars as well as earthquakes, and these things must happen, then the final judgement of God will involve the shaking of the earth and all heavenly bodies (Matthew 24:7&29).
Economically, the Labour movement stands for the fair and equal distribution of wealth created by economic activity. Everyone has a part in manufacturing widgets and serving one another, so everyone should have a share in the proceeds.
There are only three ways this can be achieved. First, a fair share of the proceeds can be achieved by totalitarian communism. Democracy must be done away with for the common good, because we know that voters will always vote in self interest. Second, fair distribution can be achieved by creating a massive, relatively well paid public sector workforce and burgeoning benefit dependent population. This is what Gordon Brown and New Labour did. Those who are state-dependent will vote, selfishly, for a government who will give them a job, good salaries and benefits. Third, a fair distribution of wealth can be achieved by a return to the Methodist roots of the Labour movement, and the biblical Christian teachings of John Wesley; especially generosity, life in the service of others and care for other human beings.
The first and second options don’t work. Labour can’t advocate both democracy and communism. It can’t afford to employ a huge public sector workforce and give out generous benefits because we have a huge and increasing debt burden. So Labour must go back to its roots, adopt biblical Christian teaching or die.
It was once thought that living standards in the UK would always go on rising. It was also claimed, by Gordon Brown, that there would be no more return to boom and bust. Then, in 2008, the UK suffered bust like never before, along with most of the Western nations. The resulting hangover is a whopping national debt of £1,560,000,000,000 which rises by £107,000,000,000 per annum or £20,000,000 per day. The books need to be balanced and the debt paid down.
The problem is, everyone is greedy and thinks only of their own interest. We all want as much as we can, without paying for it. To be able to pay down the debt, people need to be willing to share in the pain.
There are three ways forward:
1. Carry on as we are, with our fingers crossed, hoping that the economy will grow more quickly and so borrowing will reduce. This is not happening. Our GDP is creeping up and inflation is at 0%. We are already the fastest growing G7 economy, but the growth is too slow. Generosity and charity needs to be encouraged to grow the economy, as individual consumer spending won’t be enough.
2. Wait until we are declared bankrupt, or foreign investors choose to stop lending to us. This will force spending cuts and tax increases on the UK, like in Greece, and everyone will be forced to grin and bear it. In this situation, the government will be forced to make the best of a bad situation. Hyper inflation, to devalue the debt, and a tax on savings, will follow. The government will hold a gun to savers’ heads and say, “give us your savings or else.” Hiding the money under the mattress won’t work as hyper-inflation makes money worthless.
3. Be honest about the problem and call everyone to face it together. David Cameron should explain what has happened since 2008. He should say that the government had hoped the economy would grow, but it hasn’t. And so, to avoid long term pain of bankruptcy or inter-generational debt, we need to act together now to pay down out debt. The government should work with economists to devise a plan which shares the pain fairly. This should be simple enough for everyone to understand. He should also motivate people to work for the common good and not for self. He should do this by calling for a return to Christian values of loving neighbour and looking out for the interests of others (Philippians 2:4). He should do this immediately, to give us five years as a nation to work it out. The common problem of debt has the potential to unite the nation in working together for a better future.
Some politicians are calling for “the end of austerity.” It is a magical political phrase. To the general public it conveys generosity as opposed to austere, miserly scroogishness. To public servants it sounds hopeful; “Ooo, a possible pay rise or more jobs.”
I am a Scotsman, so no stereotypes please. I am torn two-ways on austerity. On the one hand, I want to be generous to hard working public servants and create more jobs for people. On the other hand, I am realistic about debt. I have been in personal debt and found it hard to get out. Since then, I have always avoided using debt, except for paying off my mortgage, which seemed to take forever.
I now teach people on the Christians Against Poverty money course, and I know the pain which debt causes many people. And so, I would like our nation to be a zero credit nation. I would like our budget to fit our tax income. I would also like to be generous.
I have lived in a few post-colonial nations, which have the same political systems which we built in Victorian Britain; the police, hospitals, schools, prisons. In these post-colonial countries, public sector pay is paltry and so encourages corruption. Anyone with power uses that power to enhance earnings. The policeman who catches someone on a mobile phone whilst driving or not wearing a seat belt or dropping litter can make life awkward unless you are willing to pay her off.
On the other hand, some nations make public officials very wealthy, taxing the nation hard and transferring the money to those in with the in-crowd.
The UK doesn’t fit either of the social models above, it’s neither corrupt nor nepatistic, though standars in public life are perceived by many to be slipping. We are, however, relatively generous. Public servants are, by and large, comfortable, and it is argued that pay is excessive in some cases.
So, austerity or generosity?
In our current situation, the ending of austerity will most probably mean bankruptcy, of the Greek variety. When it comes, salary and spending cuts are forced upon us. If we do avoid bankruptcy, then we still face decades of paying back the debt, with austerity passed to the next generation. My children and their children will be paying for my generosity.
Austerity is the choice to keep a lid on debt to avoid bankruptcy. Being generous at the wrong time is false generosity. We continue to spend 20% more than we pay in tax. We borrow an extra £107,000,000,000 each year on top of £1,560,000,000,000. It’s an eye watering amount of money.
In 2 Corinthians 9:6-7, the apostle Paul encourages generosity. “Whoever sows sparingly will also reap sparingly, and whoever sows bountifully will also reap bountifully. Each one must give as he has decided in his heart, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver.”
And the prophet Habakkuk warns the nation against piling up debt (Hab 2:6-7).
Woe to him who heaps up what is not his own—
for how long?—
and loads himself with pledges!”
Will not your debtors suddenly arise,
and those awake who will make you tremble?
Then you will be booty for them.
The foolish politician will borrow now and pay back later. The wise politician will show that debt is a problem and call the country to work together to pay down the debt for the sake of our children and our children’s children.
BBC Question Time last night left me deeply depressed by petty squabbling over the economy and the lack any real solution to our national problems of unplayable and burgeoning debt, £1,560,000,000,000 which increases by £107,000,000,000 per annum with only £513,000,000,000 tax receipts (or “the deficit” as everyone tamely refers to it) and foodbanks.
What depressed me is that politicians naturally (naively) believe that the solutions are political: increase tax here, reduce spending there, tinker with welfare payments in this way, plough more money into health, adjust the dial here and turn the nob there.
But the solution cannot be by political management and engineering, because the problem is not political it is pastoral. Britain needs a new heart.
Our nation’s heart beats to the tune of remuneration and spending. Money is our god. We have reduced every problem to one which can be paid for. If we find the right person, with the right skills, to address the problem in the right way, and pay them enough, we can fix it.
So, we motivate public service by offering salaries commensurate with the private sector, “in order to attract the right talent.” We encourage individual (credit) spending to increase economic activity, as if rampant consumerism will solve the cash flow problem in the treasury. We define poverty as a lack of food on the table and no roof over our heads.
But what if the love of God and neighbour were our goals? What is life was not about money? What if the self sacrificial love of Christ, who gave his life as a ransom for many, was the heartbeat of our nation?
What if poverty was, therefore, overcome by communities of people who loved God and each other? In these communities, no one went hungry because they shared they food and looked out for one another? What if those who made it in industry or commerce shared their profits with their neighbours? What if public servants were attracted and motivated to work because it was an opportunity to serve, as Christ came to serve, to show compassion to the hurting and care for the weak?
What if we don’t love like this? Then, what if the God of love is also the God of perfect justice? What if anyone who does not love God and neighbour but loves money instead, has to face the ultimate justice of God?
Here is my servant whom I have chosen, the one I love, in whom I delight; I will put my Spirit on him, and he will proclaim justice to the nations. Matthew 12:18
Watch this. It’s brilliant.