Dawkins – evangelical atheist?


I loved this piece from the Daily Telegraph’s Britons of the Year, 2009 (25 notable Britons) which described Richard Dawkins as an evangelical (surely evangelistic) atheist. There’s a great, really withering comment at the end which I’ve highlighted:

Richard Dawkins - story teller

Richard Dawkins: Evangelical atheist

Atheism’s most celebrated evangelist continues a glittering career in which he miraculously manages to do as much for belief in God as for disbelief. Following Richard Dawkins’ support for the bendy-bus “Enjoy your life” campaign, this year saw some of the money he helped to raise for that exercise go to follow‑up posters aimed at preventing the religious indoctrination of children. Meanwhile, the good professor endorsed atheist summer camps for children. So we indoctrinate religion, but teach atheism.

Dawkins featured on Start the Week with Andrew Marr and as first up the discussion centred on faith, evolution and rationality. Dawkins presents himself as a clever rationalist but his responses expose him as less of a reasoned man and much more a brilliant rhetorician:

Marr: you’ve led with your chin becoming a hate figure for creationists and so on…your book the God Delusion was a conflation of your atheism and theory of evolution, was it a mistake?

Dawkins: it was perhaps a politically tactical mistake if your aim is to spread the word about evolution.

If your aim is rationality generally, if your aim is to get people thinking skeptically, rationally, and to be led by evidence rather than just plain er blind faith or just plain prejudice really then no it wasn’t a mistake…evolution is an important priority but rationality is a more important priority.

What is striking about Dawkins is his lack of rationality and so a lack of self-awareness. He is such a convincing story teller that he has convinced himself of his own dogmatic beliefs by making a string of reasonable but illogical statements. Take this little nugget of unsubstantiated rhetoric:

Marr: people of faith umm find it challenging the very grounds of their faith.

Dawkins: not if you talk to the right people of faith, if you talk to bishops, archbishops and cardinals, it doesn’t, but unfortunately the majority of people of faith it certainly does.

Why should bishops, archbishops and cardinals have a monopoly on rationality such that their faith is not challenged by evolution? What sort of faith do the unnamed bishops hold? There is no reason behind Dawkin’s claim, it is plain rhetoric, which works because, in Dawkin’s world, bishops are clever and the ordinary man is simple. It’s worth listening to the rest of the interview, and reading some Dawkins, for more examples of his illogical rhetoric.

Beware of storybook wolves

One of our family’s favourite bedtime books is “Beware of the storybook wolves” by Lauren Childs.  My kids are not old enough yet to appreciate Dawkins, though my daughter says “were people once monkeys?”  Perhaps, when she’s old enough, she’ll work out that Dawkin’s books belong on the shelf with Clarice Bean and other made up stories.

Thankfully many Radio 4 listeners are rational thinkers and so won’t be fooled by Dawkin’s elaborate though vacuous and irrational story telling.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Other matters and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Dawkins – evangelical atheist?

  1. étrangère says:

    Great. I keep God Delusion on my bad fiction shelf.

  2. neilrobbie says:

    I remember skimming the God Delusion in Waterstones. I should have put it in their fiction section, if my conscience would have allowed me.

  3. Jack says:

    You mean fiction section like the section where the bible would belong to? At least Dawkins challenges people to THINK for themselves instead of being a blind obedient sheep like a lot of Christians/Muslims/Hindus/etc.

    • neilrobbie says:

      Hi Jack, welcome to TG and thank you for your comment. You are entitled to believe that the bible belongs in the fiction section, but you need to justify your belief. I’d be happy to engage with you in an intelligent, thoughtful discussion about the existence or otherwise of God. You are not entitled to be rude by making sweeping, inaccurate, unsubstantiated generalisations about Christians. Your irrational rant merely reinforces my point about Dawkins as a rhetorical thinker. Go and read some other posts on this blog and engage with them rationally, we’ll see then what it means to think.

      Neil

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s